What began as a lowbrow parody of a high school principal goes before a federal appeals court this week.Seems hard to believe that schools could possibly punish students for speech they engage in outside of school, but the Internet has truly changed the nature of speech. The Philadelphia Enquirer has more.
The case of Justin Layshock, who lanced his principal with an unflattering Internet "profile" created on a home computer, has become a battleground pitting Pennsylvania school administrators against groups that defend free-speech rights.
The 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Philadelphia will hear arguments from each side Wednesday.
Mr. Layshock used his grandmother's computer in December 2005 to create a fictitious profile of Hickory High School Principal Eric Trosch. Mr. Layshock, then a high school senior, made fun of the principal's bulk and implied that he smoked marijuana. Mr. Layshock posted the profile on the Internet social site Myspace.com.
Angered, Mr. Trosch and administrators of the Hermitage School District in Mercer County suspended Mr. Layshock from school for 10 days. After that, they placed him in an "alternative" education program that Mr. Layshock considered inferior.
Remarks and observations concerning American law and cultural studies as it relates to courses taken by students in the University of Osnabrück's and University of Münster's foreign law programs.
14 December 2008
Student Free Speech
A few weeks ago in my Debating Controversial Court Cases class, we had a lively discussion about the Tinker v. Des Moines case and whether students should have free speech rights in schools. As I mentioned in class, it seems like the Courts deal with this issue often as they struggle to balance the free speech rights of students with the interest of schools to keep order and educate students. A very interesting case was recently argued before the Third Circuit Court of Appeals. The Pittsburgh Post-Gazette reports: